Metal on Metal Total Hip Resurfacing as an Alternative to Total Hip Arthroplasty

Please note: All assessments are current as of the review date; however, new evidence that may have been published subsequently is not considered.
Review Date: October 17, 2007
Recommendation: This topic was reviewed by the California Technology Assessment Forum on October 17, 2007. It was recommended that metal on metal hip resurfacing using the BHR or Cormet 2000 devices does not meet CTAF criteria 2-5 for safety, efficacy and improvement in health outcomes.
Decision: Does Not Meet CTAF Criteria
Full Assessment: Download (PDF)

Search Assessments

Email Notification

Sign up to receive email notifications of upcoming CTAF meetings and new assessments.

 


Methodology

Learn about CTAF's approach to technology assessment.

Criteria used »
Assessment Process »
Selecting Topics for Assessment »

Suggest an Assessment

Know of a new device, procedure, or test that CTAF should consider for assessment?

Contact us »
  © 2010 California Technology Assessment Forum. All rights reserved.

Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Credits